User talk:Astounding Beyond Belief

Astounding Beyond Belief

Previous discussion was archived at User talk:Astounding Beyond Belief/Archive 1 on 2019-04-29.

should the giant shark from godziban have a page on the wiki or no?

bump

I don't see why not. Alternatively, if it doesn't have enough to substantiate a full page, you can just add it to the list of minor characters page.

ight, ima watch the episode and see if the shark has enough info for a page

This guy said this Baekunater99 one hour 6 minutes ago Someone find his address so we can assassinate him please ban him

@Les The Dawg detected

Does this guy ever give up? They're not a dawg at this point, they're just being annoying.

Hey ABB!

I was wanting to ask, would the sandbox for Allosaurus be ready to promote to a page? Or are there any more changes necessary before it can be.

It's pretty close, just needs some general proofreading

Regarding my comment on ‘Coming out’. It wasn’t my intent to emotionally harm you if I did and I’d like to apologize for it. I am very sorry for the comment and would like to make it right.

Williamaftonridinggodzilla.

I didn't feel harmed by it, so no worries there - but you do seem to be confusing gender identity and sexuality. There's no sexuality in "Coming Out".

Again I am sorry it was not one of my best comments

ABB, The Dawg created a new account and is acting like he's innocent. This is a pretty blatant violation of the rules as this is a case of the abuse of multiple accounts.

hey, is the chuai station sandbox good to be a page or could it use some improvement

No, there's barely any information on it. Look at Cloverpedia's page on the station for comparison.

ok

<script><![CDATA[(function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'93d1c53b2a64cbae',t:'MTc0Njc5OTcyMy4wMDAwMDA='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.nonce='';a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();]]></script>

Hey, ABB. I noticed that you have a few GIFs and pictures on your Tumblr page that could be used on the wiki. Would it be alright if they were uploaded here?

Sure, although be aware that .gifs on Tumblr tend to save as .webps. There are various sites you can use to convert them back to gifs.

Ezgif.com my beloved❤️

hey ABB, sorry if I've been asking you too many things recently but I wanted to clear something up with you. regarding the removal of the heat absorption section I initially put, I was A. wondering what you think it might be instead cause to me it seemed like he absorbed the flames that set him on fire and turned it into a golden energy and B. I wanted to make note of it cause its not mentioned anywhere on his page or the final wars page in general. was hoping his section in the super complete works would say anything about it, but nothing there either

bump

I would shift that information to Design. If an energy-absorbing ability was the intent, it would surely be reflected in external sources, but Manda's Japanese Wikipedia page simply describes him as being on fire in his final moments.

Got it, ill write that part in the design section. Thanks for answering

Edit: nvm i saw you add it lol

Hey ABB!

I have been working on these sandboxes (with help of course) for some monsters featured in the 1925 Lost World:

and Sandbox:Apeman

Would these be ready to promote to pages?

Astounding,

Your response to my latest post is as follows, ““This is overwrought given the relatively few delays.” The use of the term “overwrought” does not fit my work. This is your opinion and not mine. I do not believe I am being “overwrought,” I believe I am acting in good faith with civility. I believe what I have to say is very relevant to a vast many users of wiki. While the delays to this topic might be irrelevant to you, they are very relevant to other users and worth noting.

If I may butt in, you're taking it far too seriously. I don't see how calling something overwrought is questioning your good faith or civility; it just means the writing was more elaborate than it needed to be. By submitting work to a wiki you're agreeing to have it be revised, and we admins try to guide (if not make) those revisions to be as user-friendly as possible. Having a dense paragraph about every delay the show's ever had right at the top of the page is not that. Once we have pages for all of the story arcs, people will be able to see for themselves what dates everything was uploaded on.

If you would like to work on those arc pages, many of which are currently sandboxed, that would be a more productive use of your time.

Les,

With all due respect I disagree.  There have been a couple of occasions you have corrected my submissions, and I don’t have a problem with that.  None of us our perfect.  My issue is Astounding displays a constant pattern with me as well as many others, following and correcting context and meaning to our words.  It is inappropriate.  Overwrought is just an example.  Your overwrought when your life is in shambles, you’re not overwrought when you’re explaining a simple fact that a series of shows from Toho are behind schedule. Maybe he is, but I’m not.

overwrought
adjective

(of a piece of writing or a work of art) too elaborate or complicated in design or construction.

https://g.co/kgs/Jq6k6VZ

The link you provided shows the following for overwrought

You chose to highlight #2 not #1.

adjective

1.      in a state of nervous excitement or anxiety.

2.     (of a piece of writing or a work of art) too elaborate or complicated in design or construction.

Nothing in my original post was elaborate or complicated in structure.

"You chose to highlight #2 not #1"

Because that's how words work... You're going out of your way to be offended by a word because one of its multiple definitions, which isn't the one that was intended and doesn't even apply to the situation, is unsavory to you. I'd also like to point out that you quoted ABB's comment in your first message of this thread, where he's clearly describing the writing as what's overwrought, but then in your second message totally ignore that and say he was calling you overwrought (complete with spiteful "Maybe he is, but I'm not").

It reads to me more like you have a vendetta against him than he has one against you. It was meant to be a fairly innocuous comment that your paragraph was too dense/overwritten/overinformative/etc., which I agree with and explained to you why.

Les

I have Autism, and often times, it is hard to explain frustrations I have especially in a virtual setting. That has happened here. My intention was not to start something with yourself or Astounding. I am going to give Astounding an example as he is asking for; to illustrate the frustration I feel with his editing. I appreciate that he is willing to talk to me about it.  I also appreciate the time you took to intervene in this situation.

That is indeed the definition I had in mind.

Gojo, I'm happy to discuss the reasoning behind my edits in more detail - within reason - but I'm unclear what I'm doing in my patroling that's so distinct from Les and that you find so offensive.

Les approaches users with constructive criticism. He gives suggestions on different things to try.

In regards to this specific piece of work, it was in no way overwrought. You simply could have come in and asked me to shorten what I had to say and suggest I work on the sandbox areas.

In regards to your editing of mine and others work, you are coming across as personal, controlling and change the content in such a way that affects the meaning.

You wrote one sentence. It is not realistic to expect detailed feedback for every edit from any moderator. (I can't speak for the others, but I work on this site in between two jobs.) I think your read on myself and Les's editing styles is deeply ungenerous, but at the same time, you're not giving me many specifics to respond to.

The above link I accidentally uploaded. After you look at it if you could delete it. It is an example of an edit you did to my work that I feel changed the meaning entirely. I had it as one sentence that described it as it needed to be but you took it and broke it off as into two different paragraphs that disjointed the point I was making. Thank you for talking to me about it.

Whatever I was trying to do I must have accidentally published before I finished, because I just straight up did not finish the sentence beginning with "Their logo is absent". Surprised no one else caught that until now. Let me take care of that.

Thanks I appreciate it.